Email is NOT Bad!
In The New York Times, someone, thankfully, speaks in counter to people who whine about email.
October 25, 2009
By BEN YAGODA
THE TYRANNY OF E-MAIL: The Four-Thousand-Year Journey to Your Inbox
By John Freeman
Illustrated. 244 pp. Scribner. $25On a recent weekday, 126 messages made it to my e-mail in-box. Twenty-five were directed to me and me alone: 14 from friends or family, nine business-related and the other two conveying timely information about commercial accounts of mine. The rest were mass mailings or "cc’s," including 17 messages from a Listserv, eight dispatches from news media I subscribe to, seven "Google alerts" on a subject I’m interested in, four political rants and five pieces of spam, four of them in Cyrillic characters. I had been getting this odd Cyrillic e-mail for some time, and 25 of my incoming messages on this particular day were responses to a query I had sent to my colleagues asking if Russians had been spamming them, too.
By John Freeman’s lights, that makes me a bad guy. In The Tyranny of E-Mail, he writes that "one of the biggest generators of excess mail is a medium-size message sent to a group of people, which then causes a pinball effect as people chime in and comment, having a virtual discussion." And the problem is? In this case I asked a question and got helpful responses. Freeman says what I should have done is "pick up the phone." Really? Take the time to make 50 separate calls, intruding on people who aren’t interested in this issue? (Scan and delete an e-mail message: three seconds at most, at a time of one’s choice. Conduct a telephone call with me: 30 seconds, minimum, at a time of my choice, resulting in major interruption.)
The case of the Russian spam illustrates a problem with this book. In his zeal to expose e-mail’s dark side, Freeman, the editor of Granta, ignores its good and useful features.
Con't

Reader Comments